Earth Log The Human Record

The African Dawn

The Only Humans Left

There is something so familiar about it that we almost never notice how strange it is: there is only one kind of human being. Across the entire Earth — every continent, every island, every city and forest and ice station — every person belongs to a single species, Homo sapiens. We differ in colour, size, language, and custom, but these are shallow variations on one body and one mind. There is no other human species to compare ourselves against, no cousin people in the next valley who are not quite us.

This is a recent and, in the long view, abnormal condition. For almost the whole of the human story, the Earth held several kinds of human at once. As recently as fifty thousand years ago — a flicker, in the time-scales this project works in — our planet was home to Homo sapiens in Africa and the Near East, the Neanderthals across Europe and western Asia, the Denisovans somewhere in the vast Asian interior, the tiny Homo floresiensis on an Indonesian island, and another small human, Homo luzonensis, on a Philippine one. Not long before, the long-lived ancestor-form Homo erectus had still walked in Java. A traveller of that age, had one existed, could have met several different kinds of human in a single lifetime.

All of them are gone now except us. How our kind arose, what it shared the world with, and why it alone walked out of Africa to inherit the planet is the subject of this entry. We begin where our species began: in Africa, around three hundred thousand years ago.

The African Dawn

For most of the twentieth century, the oldest fossils confidently assigned to our species came from East Africa and were a little under two hundred thousand years old. The story seemed settled in outline: Homo sapiens arose somewhere in eastern Africa, perhaps around the Ethiopian Rift, less than two hundred millennia ago, and everything else followed from there.

Then the floor dropped. In 2017, a team re-examining a site called Jebel Irhoud, in Morocco — not in East Africa at all, but at the continent's northwestern corner — reported fossils of several individuals with faces strikingly like our own, alongside the stone tools and burnt flints that allowed the deposit to be dated. The date came back at about three hundred and fifteen thousand years ago [1]. These were not quite people identical to us: their faces were modern, short and tucked under the brow in the human way, but their braincases were still somewhat long and low, not yet the high round dome of a living person. They were, the researchers argued, early members of our own lineage — Homo sapiens near its very root, before the modern skull had finished taking shape. At a stroke the age of our species was pushed back by more than a hundred thousand years, and its earliest known representative was found a continent's width from where the textbooks had placed our cradle.

Jebel Irhoud did not stand alone. The famous Ethiopian fossils from Omo Kibish, long dated to about a hundred and ninety-five thousand years ago, were re-dated in 2022 by analysing the volcanic ash above them, and found to be older than previously thought — at least two hundred and thirty thousand years old [2]. The Ethiopian Herto skulls, broadly modern in form though still carrying a few robust, archaic traits, date to about a hundred and sixty thousand years ago [2]. A skull from Florisbad in South Africa, with a mix of modern and older features, is dated — though not without dispute — to around two hundred and sixty thousand years ago [2]. Read together, these finds spread the early traces of our species across the breadth of Africa — northwest, east, and south — over a span beginning more than three hundred thousand years ago. And that geographic spread is not an awkward detail to be explained away. It is, increasingly, understood to be the central clue.

Not One Cradle, But A Continent

The old picture imagined a single ancestral population — a small group, in one place, in which our species "began," from which all later humans descended. The newer picture, which has become a leading view in the years leading up to the time of writing, is harder to hold in the mind but fits the evidence better. It holds that Homo sapiens did not arise in any single spot at all. It emerged across Africa as a whole, from a patchwork of populations scattered over the continent — populations that were partly separated by distance, desert, and forest, that each drifted in their own direction, and that periodically reconnected and exchanged both genes and ideas as Africa's climate opened and closed the corridors between them [3].

On this account, which its proponents call the African multiregional or structured-population model, the modern human body and mind were not invented in one community and carried outward. Different modern features — a rounder skull here, a particular tool tradition there, a slimmer face somewhere else — appeared in different populations at different times, and were gradually shuffled together across the continent over hundreds of thousands of years by this long, intermittent mixing [3]. There was no first modern human and no Garden of Eden. There was a continent-wide, slowly braiding network of humanity, out of which the fully modern form gradually crystallised everywhere and nowhere in particular.

Recent analyses of the genomes of living and ancient Africans have given this idea quantitative teeth. They trace the ancestry of modern people back not to one ancestral group but to several only weakly separated "stem" populations, linked by gene flow over hundreds of thousands of years: the earliest divergence still detectable among living African groups dates to roughly a hundred and twenty thousand to a hundred and thirty-five thousand years ago, but it sits atop older and looser structure reaching back toward our species' beginnings — a picture that fits the genetic variation among living humans better than any single-origin model does [3]. The technical phrase that has emerged for this is a weakly structured stem: not a clean branching tree with one root, but a loose, anastomosing braid. It is a more complicated origin story than the one it replaced. It is also, on present evidence, the truer one, and it carries a certain dignity: our species is not the offspring of one lucky tribe but the shared inheritance of an entire continent's worth of ancestors.

The Flickering Of The Modern Mind

Bones tell us when people came to look like us. They do not tell us when people came to think like us. For that, archaeologists turn to what those people made and did — and here the record reveals something just as gradual and just as African as the bones.

There is a persistent myth, born of where European archaeology happened to start digging, that the modern mind switched on suddenly around forty thousand years ago, when cave paintings and carved figurines appear in Ice Age Europe — a "human revolution" or "creative explosion." The myth does not survive contact with the African evidence. In a landmark synthesis published in 2000, the archaeologists Sally McBrearty and Alison Brooks assembled the African Middle Stone Age record to show that the ingredients of modern human behaviour — long-distance trade in raw materials, the use of pigment, formal bone tools, specialised hunting, blade technology, and the marking of objects with abstract design — did not arrive all at once and did not arrive in Europe. They appeared piecemeal, in Africa, across tens of thousands of years, many of them long before any modern human set foot on another continent [4]. They titled their paper, pointedly, "The revolution that wasn't."

The African sites bear this out in vivid detail. At Pinnacle Point, on the southern Cape coast of South Africa, people were already systematically harvesting marine shellfish, using red ochre pigment, making small stone bladelets, and heat-treating silcrete with fire to improve its flaking, all by around a hundred and sixty-four thousand years ago [5] — exploiting the sea and manipulating fire to improve their toolstone at a date when, by the older story, modern behaviour had not yet begun. Further along the same coast, at Blombos Cave, the evidence is richer still. There, in deposits about a hundred thousand years old, excavators found a complete ochre-processing workshop: abalone shells used as containers, in which red pigment had been ground, mixed with bone marrow and charcoal, and stored — a small chemical industry whose purposes likely included colour, display, and meaning [6]. From somewhat later levels at the same cave, around seventy-five thousand years ago, came deliberately pierced sea-snail shells, worn as beads — personal ornament, which is to say symbol, identity, the wish to be seen a certain way [6]. And from a level about seventy-three thousand years old came a small flake of stone bearing a deliberate cross-hatched pattern drawn in ochre crayon: on present evidence among the oldest known drawings made by a human hand [6].

Two things about this record deserve emphasis. The first is its antiquity and its location: the symbolic mind is African, and it is old — far older than the European cave art it was once thought to begin with. The second is that it flickers. These innovations do not appear and then march steadily upward. The remarkable tool traditions of the southern African Middle Stone Age, known as the Still Bay and the Howiesons Poort, each flourished for a few thousand years — producing finely worked points and, in the Howiesons Poort, small geometric blades hafted into composite tools — and then, apparently, faded, the techniques seemingly lost before re-emerging later elsewhere. The modern mind, in other words, did not switch on. It guttered and flared like a flame in wind, in scattered populations across a vast continent, for a hundred thousand years and more before it burned steadily. That, too, is what we should expect from the structured, intermittently connected Africa described above: an invention made in one population could be lost when that population shrank, and would have to wait to be made again, or to spread from somewhere else, when the corridors reopened.

The Other Kinds Of Human

While our species was taking shape in Africa, it was not the only human experiment underway. The genus Homo had left Africa more than once in the deep past, and its earlier emigrants had given rise, across Eurasia, to other human species adapting to other worlds.

The best known are the Neanderthals, who occupied Europe and western Asia for several hundred thousand years. They were not the shambling brutes of caricature: they were stocky, powerful, cold-adapted people with brains as large as ours or larger, who made sophisticated tools, controlled fire, hunted big and dangerous game, cared for their injured, and buried at least some of their dead. They were, in every sense that matters, human — just not our kind of human. Their genome, recovered from fossil bone in a triumph of molecular archaeology, shows them to be our close cousins, sharing a common ancestor with us more than half a million years ago [7].

Further east lived a sister population to the Neanderthals, the Denisovans, known first not from a skull but from a single finger bone in a Siberian cave whose DNA matched no known human. They were a distinct human lineage spread, the evidence now suggests, across a great swath of Asia, from the cold of Siberia to the heights of the Tibetan plateau and likely down into the tropics [7]. We still have almost no Denisovan fossils; they are, so far, a people known mostly through their genes — and through the trace of those genes that survives, as we will see, in living humans.

And there were stranger branches yet. On the Indonesian island of Flores lived Homo floresiensis, a human shrunk by island isolation to about a metre in height, with a brain the size of a chimpanzee's, who nonetheless made stone tools and hunted — discovered in 2003 and inevitably nicknamed "the hobbit" [8]. On the Philippine island of Luzon, a separate small-bodied human, Homo luzonensis, was identified from teeth and foot bones in 2019 [8]. Closer to home, on our own species' birth continent, a small-brained human called Homo naledi — its body a curious mosaic of ancient and modern traits — survived in southern Africa, its bones left deep in a cave system there, until somewhere between about three hundred and thirty-five thousand and two hundred and thirty-six thousand years ago — overlapping in time and place with the early Homo sapiens taking shape on the same land [8]. And in Java, the long-lived ancestral species Homo erectus — which had first reached Asia more than a million and a half years earlier — appears to have survived at a site called Ngandong until somewhere between about a hundred and seventeen thousand and a hundred and eight thousand years ago, making it the last known of the older human forms to vanish [9].

The point of this roll-call is to dislodge a deep and comforting assumption. We are used to thinking of "human" and "Homo sapiens" as the same thing, because in our world they are. For most of the past they were not. Our species was born into a planet already populated by other humans — relatives shaped by other continents, other climates, other hundreds of thousands of years. We did not arise alone, and for a long time we did not live alone. What is genuinely unusual, and demands explanation, is not that there were many kinds of human, but that there came to be only one.

The False Starts

If our species was three hundred thousand years old in Africa, and the world was full of other humans to meet, the obvious question is: when did we leave? And here the record holds a surprise. We tried, and for a very long time, we failed.

The fossils show repeated early excursions of Homo sapiens out of Africa and into the Near East — the natural land bridge into the rest of the world — and, in one contested case, beyond it into southeastern Europe, long before any lasting dispersal. At Misliya Cave, on Mount Carmel in modern Israel, a piece of a modern human upper jaw has been dated to between about a hundred and seventy-seven thousand and a hundred and ninety-four thousand years ago [10] — our kind, well outside Africa, before two hundred millennia had passed. Older still, a partial skull from Apidima in southern Greece has been controversially dated to around two hundred and ten thousand years ago and interpreted as an early modern human, though the identification is disputed [11]. And at the well-known caves of Skhul and Qafzeh, also in modern Israel, modern humans were living and burying their dead between about a hundred and twenty thousand and ninety thousand years ago [12].

For most of the last century these Levantine moderns were read as a dead end — a brief, failed foray by people who pushed a little way out of Africa during a warm, wet interval, met the resident Neanderthals coming the other way, and then died out or retreated when the climate turned cold again, leaving no descendants. In their broad outline that reading still holds: none of these early emigrants founded the populations that would eventually fill the world. The genetic evidence, examined below, is clear that essentially everyone alive outside Africa today descends from a much later movement, not from the people of Misliya or Qafzeh.

And yet "failed" is not quite the whole truth, and the qualification is one of the most poignant findings in the field. The genomes of Neanderthals carry, buried in them, a trace of Homo sapiens DNA that appears to have entered the Neanderthal line very early — on the order of a hundred thousand years ago [13]. Some of those early African emigrants, in other words, did not merely die in the Levant. They met Neanderthals, and they had children with them, and a thread of their ancestry rode forward inside the Neanderthal population long after the emigrants themselves were gone. They left almost no surviving human lineage of their own, but they left a whisper of themselves in another kind of human. The false starts were not quite barren. They were rehearsals — and a record that they happened survives, written into the genome of a people who themselves no longer exist.

The Long Stay

Here we reach the deepest puzzle of this entry, and the reason its working title was for a time "the long stay." Our species existed for something like a quarter of a million years before it spread across the Earth. It was taking on modern anatomy by three hundred thousand years ago, a modern symbolic mind flickering into life across Africa by a hundred thousand years ago, and demonstrated repeatedly — at Apidima, Misliya, Skhul, Qafzeh — that it could and did walk out of Africa. And still, for almost all of that time, it stayed an African animal. The peopling of the planet, when it finally came, occupied only the last fraction of our species' existence. Why the wait?

Part of the answer is climate, and specifically the gatekeeper of the African exits. The corridors out of Africa — across the Sahara and through the Nile and Arabian routes — are deserts for most of the time, lethal barriers to people on foot. But the Sahara is not permanently a desert. Driven by slow wobbles in the Earth's orbit, it swings, every some tens of thousands of years, between bone-dry and astonishingly green — a "Green Sahara" laced with rivers, lakes, and grassland across which animals and people could move [14]. These episodes act as a pump: when the desert greens, the gates out of Africa open; when it dries, they slam shut. For a dispersal to succeed, a population had to be poised at the gate, in sufficient numbers and with the right capabilities, during one of these green windows — and most of the time, for most of our history, that conjunction did not occur, or the people who passed through did not survive what they met on the other side.

But the climate gate is only part of the answer, because the genetic evidence reveals something more specific and more humbling about who finally did get through. In 2016, three large studies sequenced human genomes from populations all over the world and converged on the same striking conclusion: essentially every human being alive today outside Africa — every European, every Asian, every Australian, every Native American, every Pacific Islander — descends overwhelmingly from a single dispersal out of Africa, which happened between roughly seventy thousand and fifty thousand years ago [15]. Not many successful waves; one main wave, from which the entire non-African world is descended. The whole sprawling human population of five other continents traces back, genetically, to what was probably a relatively small founding group that crossed out of Africa in that window and never looked back.

This is the founder effect writ across a planet. It means that the genetic diversity of all the world's non-African peoples combined is smaller than the diversity found within Africa alone, because everyone outside Africa came through that one narrow gate, carrying only the slice of African variation their founding band happened to possess. It is the reason Africa remains, genetically, the most diverse continent on Earth: it is the homeland that kept the full inheritance, while the rest of the world was settled by the descendants of a single emigrant population.

A long-popular idea linked this bottleneck to a specific catastrophe — the eruption of the Toba supervolcano in Sumatra around seventy-four thousand years ago, the largest volcanic eruption of the last two million years, which some argued nearly exterminated humanity and reduced us to a few thousand survivors. The evidence has not been kind to the strong version of that story: excavations in both Africa and India show human populations living through the Toba ashfall and continuing on the other side, apparently without collapse [16]. The eruption was real and vast, and it may have stressed populations regionally, but it does not appear to have been the throttle that nearly ended us. The smallness of the founding non-African group is better understood not as the scar of one disaster but as the ordinary consequence of a planet being peopled by the descendants of a single, modest band of travellers.

Two further genetic landmarks place the human family in time. The most recent common ancestor of all living human maternal lineages — traced through mitochondrial DNA, passed only from mother to child, and known by the inevitable nickname mitochondrial Eve — lived in Africa somewhere around a hundred and fifty thousand to two hundred thousand years ago [17]. The corresponding ancestor of all living male lineages, traced through the Y chromosome and called Y-chromosomal Adam, lived perhaps two hundred thousand to three hundred thousand years ago [17]. These were not the only people alive in their day, nor a couple, nor anything like the figures of legend; they are simply the points at which two particular threads of inheritance converge as we follow them backward. But they are a reminder, etched in the molecules of every living person, that the whole of humanity is a single, recent, African family.

The Threshold

So we arrive at the edge of the great journey, with the traveller not yet departed. Picture the situation as it stood around seventy thousand years ago. Our species had existed for a quarter of a million years, almost all of it in Africa. It had a body and a mind indistinguishable from our own. It had buried its dead, strung beads, ground pigment, and drawn the first lines. It had filled Africa with its scattered, braided populations and pressed, more than once, against the gates to the north, only to fall back. Beyond those gates lived other kinds of human — Neanderthals in the European cold, Denisovans across the Asian vastness, small island peoples in the southeast — going about their own ancient lives, with no notion that anything was coming.

Then the corridors out of Africa opened again, and this time the people who passed through kept going. From that single dispersal would come, overwhelmingly, every human society this project will ever describe outside Africa: the painters of Ice Age Europe, the first Australians crossing open water to a new continent, the mammoth-hunters of the Siberian cold, the people who would walk into an empty New World, and, in time, every reader of these words who is not African by descent. Within a few tens of thousands of years, our kind would stand on every continent but Antarctica — and would be, for the first time, the only kind of human left anywhere.

To whoever reads this — human of a later age, or something our descendants became, or a mind we built, or a stranger to our whole story — understand what is about to happen as the hinge on which your own existence turns. Everything you are, and everywhere your kind has ever stood, begins with a small band of African people slipping out of the continent through a briefly open gate, into a world already full of other humans, carrying nothing that any of them could have recognised as the future. How they crossed the Earth, whom they met, and what became of those they met, is the story of the next entry.

Marquez Comelab
Earth Log Project
Planet Earth
Year 2026

References

  1. Hublin, Jean-Jacques, Abdelouahed Ben-Ncer, Shara E. Bailey, Sarah E. Freidline, Simon Neubauer, Matthew M. Skinner, Inga Bergmann, et al. "New fossils from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco and the pan-African origin of Homo sapiens." Nature 546(7657) (2017): 289–292. See also Richter, Daniel, Rainer Grün, Renaud Joannes-Boyau, Teresa E. Steele, Fethi Amani, Mathieu Rué, Paul Fernandes, et al. "The age of the hominin fossils from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco, and the origins of the Middle Stone Age." Nature 546(7657) (2017): 293–296.
  2. Vidal, Céline M., Christine S. Lane, Asfawossen Asrat, Dan N. Barfod, Darren F. Mark, Emma L. Tomlinson, Amdemichael Zafu Tadesse, et al. "Age of the oldest known Homo sapiens from eastern Africa." Nature 601(7894) (2022): 579–583. See also McDougall, Ian, Francis H. Brown, and John G. Fleagle. "Stratigraphic placement and age of modern humans from Kibish, Ethiopia." Nature 433(7027) (2005): 733–736; and White, Tim D., Berhane Asfaw, David DeGusta, Henry Gilbert, Gary D. Richards, Gen Suwa, and F. Clark Howell. "Pleistocene Homo sapiens from Middle Awash, Ethiopia." Nature 423(6941) (2003): 742–747; and Grün, Rainer, John S. Brink, Nigel A. Spooner, Lois Taylor, Chris B. Stringer, Robert G. Franciscus, and Andrew S. Murray. "Direct dating of Florisbad hominid." Nature 382(6591) (1996): 500–501.
  3. Scerri, Eleanor M. L., Mark G. Thomas, Andrea Manica, Philipp Gunz, Jay T. Stock, Chris Stringer, Matt Grove, et al. "Did Our Species Evolve in Subdivided Populations across Africa, and Why Does It Matter?" Trends in Ecology & Evolution 33(8) (2018): 582–594. See also Ragsdale, Aaron P., Timothy D. Weaver, Elizabeth G. Atkinson, Eileen G. Hoal, Marlo Möller, Brenna M. Henn, and Simon Gravel. "A weakly structured stem for human origins in Africa." Nature 617(7962) (2023): 755–763.
  4. McBrearty, Sally, and Alison S. Brooks. "The revolution that wasn't: a new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior." Journal of Human Evolution 39(5) (2000): 453–563.
  5. Marean, Curtis W., Miryam Bar-Matthews, Jocelyn Bernatchez, Erich Fisher, Paul Goldberg, Andy I. R. Herries, Zenobia Jacobs, et al. "Early human use of marine resources and pigment in South Africa during the Middle Pleistocene." Nature 449(7164) (2007): 905–908. See also Brown, Kyle S., Curtis W. Marean, Andy I. R. Herries, Zenobia Jacobs, Chantal Tribolo, David Braun, David L. Roberts, Michael C. Meyer, and Jocelyn Bernatchez. "Fire As an Engineering Tool of Early Modern Humans." Science 325(5942) (2009): 859–862.
  6. Henshilwood, Christopher S., Francesco d'Errico, Karen L. van Niekerk, Yvan Coquinot, Zenobia Jacobs, Stein-Erik Lauritzen, Michel Menu, and Renata García-Moreno. "A 100,000-Year-Old Ochre-Processing Workshop at Blombos Cave, South Africa." Science 334(6053) (2011): 219–222. See also Henshilwood, Christopher S., Francesco d'Errico, Karen L. van Niekerk, Laure Dayet, Alain Queffelec, and Luca Pollarolo. "An abstract drawing from the 73,000-year-old levels at Blombos Cave, South Africa." Nature 562(7725) (2018): 115–118; and d'Errico, Francesco, Christopher Henshilwood, Marian Vanhaeren, and Karen van Niekerk. "Nassarius kraussianus shell beads from Blombos Cave: evidence for symbolic behaviour in the Middle Stone Age." Journal of Human Evolution 48(1) (2005): 3–24.
  7. Green, Richard E., Johannes Krause, Adrian W. Briggs, Tomislav Maricic, Udo Stenzel, Martin Kircher, Nick Patterson, et al. "A Draft Sequence of the Neandertal Genome." Science 328(5979) (2010): 710–722. See also Prüfer, Kay, Fernando Racimo, Nick Patterson, Flora Jay, Sriram Sankararaman, Susanna Sawyer, Anja Heinze, et al. "The complete genome sequence of a Neandertal from the Altai Mountains." Nature 505(7481) (2014): 43–49; and Reich, David, Richard E. Green, Martin Kircher, Johannes Krause, Nick Patterson, Eric Y. Durand, Bence Viola, et al. "Genetic history of an archaic hominin group from Denisova Cave in Siberia." Nature 468(7327) (2010): 1053–1060; and, for the Denisovan presence on the Tibetan Plateau, Chen, Fahu, Frido Welker, Chuan-Chou Shen, Shara E. Bailey, Inga Bergmann, Simon Davis, Huan Xia, et al. "A late Middle Pleistocene Denisovan mandible from the Tibetan Plateau." Nature 569(7756) (2019): 409–412.
  8. Brown, P., T. Sutikna, M. J. Morwood, R. P. Soejono, Jatmiko, E. Wayhu Saptomo, and Rokus Awe Due. "A new small-bodied hominin from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia." Nature 431(7012) (2004): 1055–1061. See also Sutikna, Thomas, Matthew W. Tocheri, Michael J. Morwood, E. Wahyu Saptomo, Jatmiko, Rokus Due Awe, Sri Wasisto, et al. "Revised stratigraphy and chronology for Homo floresiensis at Liang Bua in Indonesia." Nature 532(7599) (2016): 366–369; and Détroit, Florent, Armand Salvador Mijares, Julien Corny, Guillaume Daver, Clément Zanolli, Eusebio Dizon, Emil Robles, Rainer Grün, and Philip J. Piper. "A new species of Homo from the Late Pleistocene of the Philippines." Nature 568(7751) (2019): 181–186. See also, for Homo naledi, Berger, Lee R., John Hawks, Darryl J. de Ruiter, Steven E. Churchill, Peter Schmid, Lucas K. Delezene, Tracy L. Kivell, et al. "Homo naledi, a new species of the genus Homo from the Dinaledi Chamber, South Africa." eLife 4 (2015): e09560; and Dirks, Paul H. G. M., Eric M. Roberts, Hannah Hilbert-Wolf, Jan D. Kramers, John Hawks, Anthony Dosseto, Mathieu Duval, et al. "The age of Homo naledi and associated sediments in the Rising Star Cave, South Africa." eLife 6 (2017): e24231.
  9. Rizal, Yan, Kira E. Westaway, Yahdi Zaim, Gerrit D. van den Bergh, E. Arthur Bettis III, Michael J. Morwood, O. Frank Huffman, et al. "Last appearance of Homo erectus at Ngandong, Java, 117,000–108,000 years ago." Nature 577(7790) (2020): 381–385.
  10. Hershkovitz, Israel, Gerhard W. Weber, Rolf Quam, Mathieu Duval, Rainer Grün, Leslie Kinsley, Avner Ayalon, et al. "The earliest modern humans outside Africa." Science 359(6374) (2018): 456–459.
  11. Harvati, Katerina, Carolin Röding, Abel M. Bosman, Fotios A. Karakostis, Rainer Grün, Chris Stringer, Panagiotis Karkanas, et al. "Apidima Cave fossils provide earliest evidence of Homo sapiens in Eurasia." Nature 571(7766) (2019): 500–504.
  12. Grün, Rainer, Chris Stringer, Frank McDermott, Robert Nathan, Naomi Porat, Steve Robertson, Lois Romain, et al. "U-series and ESR analyses of bones and teeth relating to the human burials from Skhul." Journal of Human Evolution 49(3) (2005): 316–334. See also Bar-Yosef, Ofer. "The chronology of the Middle Paleolithic of the Levant." In Neandertals and Modern Humans in Western Asia, edited by Takeru Akazawa, Kenichi Aoki, and Ofer Bar-Yosef, 39–56. New York: Plenum Press, 1998.
  13. Kuhlwilm, Martin, Ilan Gronau, Melissa J. Hubisz, Cesare de Filippo, Javier Prado-Martinez, Martin Kircher, Qiaomei Fu, et al. "Ancient gene flow from early modern humans into Eastern Neanderthals." Nature 530(7591) (2016): 429–433.
  14. Larrasoaña, Juan C., Andrew P. Roberts, and Eelco J. Rohling. "Dynamics of Green Sahara Periods and Their Role in Hominin Evolution." PLOS ONE 8(10) (2013): e76514. See also Tierney, Jessica E., Francesco S. R. Pausata, and Peter B. deMenocal. "Rainfall regimes of the Green Sahara." Science Advances 3(1) (2017): e1601503; and Drake, Nick A., Roger M. Blench, Simon J. Armitage, Charlie S. Bristow, and Kevin H. White. "Ancient watercourses and biogeography of the Sahara explain the peopling of the desert." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108(2) (2011): 458–462.
  15. Mallick, Swapan, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, Iain Mathieson, Melissa Gymrek, Fernando Racimo, Mengyao Zhao, et al. "The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 genomes from 142 diverse populations." Nature 538(7624) (2016): 201–206. See also Malaspinas, Anna-Sapfo, Michael C. Westaway, Craig Muller, Vitor C. Sousa, Oscar Lao, Isabel Alves, Anders Bergström, et al. "A genomic history of Aboriginal Australia." Nature 538(7624) (2016): 207–214; and Pagani, Luca, Daniel John Lawson, Evelyn Jagoda, Alexander Mörseburg, Anders Eriksson, Mario Mitt, Florian Clemente, et al. "Genomic analyses inform on migration events during the peopling of Eurasia." Nature 538(7624) (2016): 238–242.
  16. Smith, Eugene I., Zenobia Jacobs, Racheal Johnsen, Minghua Ren, Erich C. Fisher, Simen Oestmo, Jayne Wilkins, et al. "Humans thrived in South Africa through the Toba eruption about 74,000 years ago." Nature 555(7697) (2018): 511–515. See also Petraglia, Michael, Ravi Korisettar, Nicole Boivin, Christopher Clarkson, Peter Ditchfield, Sacha Jones, Jinu Koshy, et al. "Middle Paleolithic Assemblages from the Indian Subcontinent Before and After the Toba Super-Eruption." Science 317(5834) (2007): 114–116.
  17. Poznik, G. David, Yali Xue, Fernando L. Mendez, Thomas F. Willems, Andrea Massaia, Melissa A. Wilson Sayres, Qasim Ayub, et al. "Punctuated bursts in human male demography inferred from 1,244 worldwide Y-chromosome sequences." Nature Genetics 48(6) (2016): 593–599. See also Mendez, Fernando L., Thomas Krahn, Bonnie Schrack, Astrid-Maria Krahn, Krishna R. Veeramah, August E. Woerner, Forka Leypey Mathew Fomine, et al. "An African American Paternal Lineage Adds an Extremely Ancient Root to the Human Y Chromosome Phylogenetic Tree." American Journal of Human Genetics 92(3) (2013): 454–459; and Soares, Pedro, Luca Ermini, Noel Thomson, Maru Mormina, Teresa Rito, Arne Röhl, Antonio Salas, Stephen Oppenheimer, Vincent Macaulay, and Martin B. Richards. "Correcting for Purifying Selection: An Improved Human Mitochondrial Molecular Clock." American Journal of Human Genetics 84(6) (2009): 740–759.